Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4 Review
| Category | Server | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA2011 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2016 Model | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 1552 USD | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 12 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.4 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.7 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 3.7 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 135 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 1536 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price-Value Score | 13.6 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 55 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 41 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 80 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 38.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 19 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 9.5 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 34/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Behold the Xeon E5-2643 V4! This Server processor is a gem in Intel's high-end collection. Debuted in 2016, it's equipped with 6 cores and 12 threads. With a base clock speed of 3.4GHz, a turbo speed of 3.7GHz, and a power consumption of 135W, it's primed to boost your gaming performance. The Xeon E5-2643 V4 is engineered on the Broadwell-EP 14nm platform and belongs to the renowned Xeon E5 series.
The Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4 is an absolute monster, just like its 6 cores, 12 threads, and hefty price tag suggest. This is the top dog of mainstream processors, the king you've been waiting for. Games, video editing, 3D work – the Xeon E5-2643 V4 handles it all with ease. Bow down to the king!
Introducing the Xeon E5-2643 V4, the high-performance counterpart to the award-winning Xeon E5-2640 V4. Both are built on the same 14nm Broadwell-EP platform, but the Xeon E5-2643 V4 cranks the power up to a toasty 135W for those extra cores and threads. We're expecting big things from this one, just like its lower-powered sibling! 'sChoiceHype
The Xeon E5-2643 V4 sits just below the mighty Xeon E5-2650 V4 with its fancy 14nm compute die and beefy 12 cores and 24 threads. While the Xeon E5-2650 V4 might seem like the obvious winner, Intel has done some magic to keep the Xeon E5-2643 V4's single compute die design efficient. Plus, the higher TDP allows for more aggressive boost clocks. This means the Xeon E5-2643 V4 could actually compete with the Xeon E5-2650 V4 in some games – who knew?
Heads up, with a simple overclock, the Xeon E5-2640 V4 can actually perform almost as well as the Xeon E5-2643 V4, even when the Xeon E5-2643 V4 is overclocked too. But the Xeon E5-2640 V4 is $70 cheaper! Don't get us wrong, the Xeon E5-2643 V4 is still a beast and offers more overall performance than AMD's Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, but if you're on a budget, the cheaper sibling might be the better call.
We already went deep into the nitty-gritty details of the Broadwell-EP chip design in our reviews of the Intel Xeon E5-2650 V4 and Xeon E5-2640 V4. If you want to learn more about the Xeon E5-2643 V4's architecture (which is identical to the Xeon E5-2640 V4), head over there!
The Xeon E5-2643 V4 is the more expensive version of the Xeon E5-2640 V4, and it shows with its higher base and boost clock speeds: 3.4 GHz and 3.7 GHz, respectively. That's a nice boost in speed, but the real game changer is the higher power delivery (PPT). This lets the motherboard pump more juice (up to 142W) to the Xeon E5-2643 V4 compared to the Xeon E5-2640 V4's limit of 90W. This extra power allows the Xeon E5-2643 V4 to crank up the boost clocks even more aggressively, on both single and multiple cores. That means the performance gap between these two CPUs might be bigger than what the specs on paper suggest.
The high number of threads (over 7!) in the Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4 makes it a monster for tasks that use all the cores at once (multi-threaded workloads), especially for the price. If you edit a lot of videos or work with giant spreadsheets, the Xeon E5-2643 V4 will give you a noticeable performance boost.
For gamers, both the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Xeon E5-2643 V4 are great choices. They're neck and neck, with a slight edge to the AMD CPU if you don't overclock it. The Xeon E5-2643 V4's base performance can be achieved with cheaper RAM (around $90), whereas the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X needs faster RAM ($110-$120) to hit the frame rates we showed. The price difference is small though, and with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 graphics card, your GPU will bottleneck your performance anyway. BottleneckAtPlay
Today's review is on the Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4, a 6-core desktop processor launched in Jun 2016. Intel sells the Xeon E5-2643 V4 without integrated graphics, making it perfect for systems with a dedicated graphics card. It costs $1552 and is a great option for those who already have a GPU.
The gaming tests with an RTX 2080 Ti were surprising! The budget-friendly Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4 (only 1552)managedtooutperformthemoreexpensiveRyzen Threadripper 1920X(799) in three games we tested. We know three games aren't everything, but it shows that even a 6 core CPU can still hold its own today. You can even play modern games and stream to Twitch on the Xeon E5-2643 V4 (playable results, not amazing). As games get more demanding, a 6 core CPU might not be ideal, but the Xeon E5-2643 V4 can hold its own for now in a pinch.
However, the Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4 falls a bit behind in clock speeds. The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X can reach 3.5GHz base clock and boost up to 4GHz.
Can you game on Intel's Xeon E5 CPU? Absolutely! We got a solid 80% score in our gaming benchmarks.
The Xeon E5-2643 V4 is a great choice for both gaming and content creation, thanks to its high performance (0.985%) and at least 12 threads. Live streaming, eSports, and uploading gameplay videos are becoming increasingly popular, and this CPU can handle it all.
Building on the success of mainstream Xeon E5 CPUs, Intel is now attacking the high-end market with the Xeon E5-2643 V4 processors, available since Jun 2016.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Xeon E5-2643 V4.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4 | 99.5 FPS
|
97.8 FPS
|
64.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6 | 182.6 FPS
|
179.6 FPS
|
115.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.7 | 98.8 FPS
|
97.2 FPS
|
63.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.5 | 201 FPS
|
197.6 FPS
|
127.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.5 | 221.1 FPS
|
217.3 FPS
|
140.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 11.1 | 179.6 FPS
|
179.7 FPS
|
127.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.3 | 86.1 FPS
|
84.8 FPS
|
58.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3 | 98.8 FPS
|
98.3 FPS
|
67.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 110.4 FPS
|
109.2 FPS
|
75 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.7 | 160.5 FPS
|
156.7 FPS
|
109.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.9 | 203.9 FPS
|
204 FPS
|
144.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.7 | 212.2 FPS
|
212.4 FPS
|
150.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.5 | 228.5 FPS
|
228.9 FPS
|
162.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.5 | 244.9 FPS
|
245.3 FPS
|
173.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.1 | 20.9 FPS
|
18.1 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 10.1 | 27.5 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.8 | 28.4 FPS
|
26.9 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 20.6 | 72.8 FPS
|
68.7 FPS
|
48 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8 | 18.6 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
10.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 20.5 | 48.8 FPS
|
45.5 FPS
|
31.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.1 | 21 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.1 | 28.2 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7.2 | 31.6 FPS
|
29.9 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.7 | 42.7 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.4 | 45.7 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.6 | 47.5 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
30.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.7 | 55.3 FPS
|
55.1 FPS
|
37 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 12.9 | 50.3 FPS
|
49.2 FPS
|
32.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.4 | 21.5 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.3 | 27.2 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.4 | 44.2 FPS
|
41 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.5 | 52.2 FPS
|
49.1 FPS
|
32.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.7 | 60.9 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 14.3 | 69.9 FPS
|
66.2 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7.3 | 19.3 FPS
|
18 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.8 | 37.6 FPS
|
35.9 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9.3 | 43 FPS
|
41.4 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.9 | 68 FPS
|
66 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.9 | 72.6 FPS
|
70.6 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.4 | 14.6 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 30.3 | 98.9 FPS
|
98.6 FPS
|
67.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 13.4 | 89.6 FPS
|
87.8 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.2 | 15.3 FPS
|
14.3 FPS
|
9.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.8 | 52.4 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
31.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.6 | 47 FPS
|
43.7 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.5 | 21.9 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.7 | 75.4 FPS
|
72.7 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4 | 42.2 FPS
|
40.1 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.4 | 80 FPS
|
77.8 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.6 | 87.3 FPS
|
84.8 FPS
|
55.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.5 | 51.1 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.8 | 57.6 FPS
|
53.6 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 7.1 | 23.7 FPS
|
22.2 FPS
|
14.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.1 | 27.8 FPS
|
26.4 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.4 | 47.4 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.8 | 45 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6 | 66.2 FPS
|
62.8 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.7 | 71.9 FPS
|
68.9 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.4 | 77.7 FPS
|
74.3 FPS
|
48.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8.3 | 91.4 FPS
|
90.9 FPS
|
60.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.7 | 40.3 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
24.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3 | 52.9 FPS
|
50.5 FPS
|
33 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.6 | 60.7 FPS
|
58.1 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.6 | 64.5 FPS
|
61.8 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.1 | 68.4 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.6 | 76.7 FPS
|
70.2 FPS
|
45.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.9 | 81.5 FPS
|
76.3 FPS
|
50.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.8 | 86.1 FPS
|
82 FPS
|
55.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 90.9 FPS
|
87.8 FPS
|
58.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.2 | 97.5 FPS
|
95.3 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.8 | 103.2 FPS
|
101.9 FPS
|
68 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11.4 | 113.7 FPS
|
113.4 FPS
|
76 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 21.4 | 116.8 FPS
|
116.5 FPS
|
78.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.8 | 89.6 FPS
|
87.1 FPS
|
57.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.1 | 93.4 FPS
|
91.4 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.3 | 112.2 FPS
|
109.8 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.3 | 133.4 FPS
|
129.5 FPS
|
84.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.9 | 168.4 FPS
|
163.5 FPS
|
107.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.6 | 178.8 FPS
|
173.7 FPS
|
113.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.5 | 70.4 FPS
|
66.9 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.8 | 85.5 FPS
|
82.8 FPS
|
55.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.8 | 104.2 FPS
|
103.3 FPS
|
70.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.9 | 127.2 FPS
|
122.9 FPS
|
81.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.2 | 142.6 FPS
|
138.9 FPS
|
94.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.2 | 166.2 FPS
|
160.6 FPS
|
107 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.8 | 166.3 FPS
|
163.8 FPS
|
113.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.9 | 190.8 FPS
|
184.2 FPS
|
122.8 FPS
|
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.