Intel Xeon W-2275 Review
| Category | Server | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA2066 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
| Cooler Included | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2019 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price | 1112 USD | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 14 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Threads | 28 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Core Frequency | 3.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4.8 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.8 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 165 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 1024 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price-Value Score | 44.4 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 75 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 63 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 89 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 22.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 11.3 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 5.6 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 52/100 | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Get to know the Xeon W-2275! This Server processor is a beast in Intel's high-end series. Launched in 2019, it's armed with 14 cores and 28 threads. It runs at a base frequency of 3.3GHz, can boost up to 4.8GHz, and has a power requirement of 165W, ready to power up your gaming rig. The Xeon W-2275 is a product of the Cascade Lake SP 14nm process and is a part of the acclaimed Xeon W series.
Want a high-end desktop (HEDT) CPU with 24 cores to compete with the Intel Xeon W-2275? Be prepared to spend some serious coin. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX costs $1299 and doesn't even guarantee better performance.
No surprise here, a beastly 14-core, 28-thread CPU with a 4.8GHz boost clock absolutely shreds. The Intel Xeon W-2275 is the undisputed king of consumer CPUs (until you jump into the HEDT market, that is) – at least until you upgrade to the Xeon W-2295. Get ready to dominate the competition!
The Intel Xeon W-2275 is an absolute monster, just like its 14 cores, 28 threads, and hefty price tag suggest. This is the top dog of mainstream processors, the king you've been waiting for. Games, video editing, 3D work – the Xeon W-2275 handles it all with ease. Bow down to the king!
The Xeon W-2275 sits just below the mighty Xeon W-2295 with its fancy 14nm compute die and beefy 18 cores and 36 threads. While the Xeon W-2295 might seem like the obvious winner, Intel has done some magic to keep the Xeon W-2275's single compute die design efficient. Plus, the higher TDP allows for more aggressive boost clocks. This means the Xeon W-2275 could actually compete with the Xeon W-2295 in some games – who knew?
We already went deep into the nitty-gritty details of the Cascade Lake SP chip design in our reviews of the Intel Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-2265. If you want to learn more about the Xeon W-2275's architecture (which is identical to the Xeon W-2265), head over there!
The high number of threads (over 7!) in the Intel Xeon W-2275 makes it a monster for tasks that use all the cores at once (multi-threaded workloads), especially for the price. If you edit a lot of videos or work with giant spreadsheets, the Xeon W-2275 will give you a noticeable performance boost.
The gaming tests with an RTX 2080 Ti were surprising! The budget-friendly Intel Xeon W-2275 (only 1112)managedtooutperformthemoreexpensiveRyzen Threadripper 2970WX(1299) in three games we tested. We know three games aren't everything, but it shows that even a 14 core CPU can still hold its own today. You can even play modern games and stream to Twitch on the Xeon W-2275 (playable results, not amazing). As games get more demanding, a 14 core CPU might not be ideal, but the Xeon W-2275 can hold its own for now in a pinch.
With Xeon W, Intel brings new innovation with its new architecture and a 14nm manufacturing process. Similar to Xeon W, Xeon W is built for the LGA2066 platform with support for all the latest features like DDR4 RAM, super-fast NVMe SSDs, and Thunderbolt 3 ports.
Can you game on Intel's Xeon W CPU? Absolutely! We got a solid 89% score in our gaming benchmarks.
The Xeon W-2275 is a great choice for both gaming and content creation, thanks to its high performance (1.2316666666667%) and at least 12 threads. Live streaming, eSports, and uploading gameplay videos are becoming increasingly popular, and this CPU can handle it all.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Xeon W-2275
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Xeon W-2275.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.2 | 124.6 FPS
|
107.1 FPS
|
67.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 4.8 | 228.6 FPS
|
196.6 FPS
|
120.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.2 | 123.7 FPS
|
106.4 FPS
|
66.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 3.6 | 251.6 FPS
|
216.3 FPS
|
132.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 3.6 | 276.8 FPS
|
237.9 FPS
|
146.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 8.9 | 224.8 FPS
|
196.8 FPS
|
132.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 1.9 | 107.8 FPS
|
92.8 FPS
|
60.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.4 | 123.7 FPS
|
107.6 FPS
|
70.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 2.9 | 138.2 FPS
|
119.5 FPS
|
78.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3 | 201 FPS
|
171.6 FPS
|
114.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.1 | 255.3 FPS
|
223.4 FPS
|
150.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 4.5 | 265.7 FPS
|
232.6 FPS
|
156.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 2.8 | 286.1 FPS
|
250.6 FPS
|
169.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 5.2 | 306.6 FPS
|
268.6 FPS
|
181.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.7 | 26.2 FPS
|
19.8 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 8.1 | 34.4 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 7 | 35.6 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 16.5 | 91.1 FPS
|
75.2 FPS
|
50 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.4 | 23.3 FPS
|
17 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 16.4 | 61.1 FPS
|
49.9 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.6 | 26.4 FPS
|
20.5 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.6 | 35.3 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
17.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 5.8 | 39.6 FPS
|
32.7 FPS
|
20.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 6.1 | 53.5 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
26.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 7.5 | 57.3 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
30.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.2 | 59.5 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 9.4 | 69.2 FPS
|
60.3 FPS
|
38.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.3 | 62.9 FPS
|
53.9 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 5.9 | 26.9 FPS
|
21.8 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.9 | 34 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 5.9 | 55.4 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
29.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 8.4 | 65.4 FPS
|
53.8 FPS
|
33.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 8.5 | 76.2 FPS
|
63.5 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 11.4 | 87.6 FPS
|
72.4 FPS
|
45.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 5.8 | 24.2 FPS
|
19.7 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 3.8 | 47.1 FPS
|
39.3 FPS
|
24.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.4 | 53.8 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.7 | 85.2 FPS
|
72.2 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 90.8 FPS
|
77.3 FPS
|
48 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.3 | 18.3 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
8.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 24.2 | 123.8 FPS
|
108 FPS
|
70.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 10.7 | 112.2 FPS
|
96.1 FPS
|
62.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.1 | 19.1 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
9.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3 | 65.6 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
32.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 2.9 | 58.8 FPS
|
47.9 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 3.6 | 27.4 FPS
|
22.3 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3 | 94.5 FPS
|
79.6 FPS
|
49.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.2 | 52.8 FPS
|
43.9 FPS
|
26.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 3.5 | 100.1 FPS
|
85.2 FPS
|
53.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 109.3 FPS
|
92.8 FPS
|
57.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 3.6 | 64 FPS
|
51.9 FPS
|
31.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 3.9 | 72.2 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
35.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 5.7 | 29.6 FPS
|
24.3 FPS
|
14.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.9 | 34.8 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.3 | 59.3 FPS
|
48.6 FPS
|
30.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3 | 56.3 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
28.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.8 | 82.9 FPS
|
68.8 FPS
|
42.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 4.5 | 90.1 FPS
|
75.4 FPS
|
47 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.1 | 97.2 FPS
|
81.4 FPS
|
50.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 6.6 | 114.4 FPS
|
99.5 FPS
|
63.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3 | 50.5 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.4 | 66.2 FPS
|
55.3 FPS
|
34.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 2.9 | 76 FPS
|
63.7 FPS
|
39.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 2.8 | 80.8 FPS
|
67.7 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.3 | 85.7 FPS
|
71.7 FPS
|
44.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 3.6 | 96 FPS
|
76.9 FPS
|
47.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 3.9 | 102 FPS
|
83.6 FPS
|
52.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.6 | 107.8 FPS
|
89.8 FPS
|
57.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.4 | 113.8 FPS
|
96.1 FPS
|
60.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.7 | 122.1 FPS
|
104.4 FPS
|
65.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.4 | 129.2 FPS
|
111.6 FPS
|
70.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 9.1 | 142.3 FPS
|
124.2 FPS
|
79.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 17.1 | 146.2 FPS
|
127.5 FPS
|
81.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 6.2 | 112.2 FPS
|
95.4 FPS
|
59.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.2 | 116.9 FPS
|
100 FPS
|
62.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.4 | 140.5 FPS
|
120.2 FPS
|
74.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.5 | 167 FPS
|
141.8 FPS
|
88.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.1 | 210.8 FPS
|
179.1 FPS
|
111.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 4.5 | 223.9 FPS
|
190.2 FPS
|
118.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 2.8 | 88.1 FPS
|
73.2 FPS
|
46.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.1 | 107 FPS
|
90.7 FPS
|
58.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.1 | 130.5 FPS
|
113.1 FPS
|
73.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.1 | 159.2 FPS
|
134.5 FPS
|
85.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.4 | 178.6 FPS
|
152.1 FPS
|
98.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.4 | 208.1 FPS
|
175.8 FPS
|
111.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.8 | 208.2 FPS
|
179.4 FPS
|
118.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 6.3 | 238.9 FPS
|
201.7 FPS
|
128.1 FPS
|
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.