Intel Xeon E5-2620 Review
| Category | Server | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA2011 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2012 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 36 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 12 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 2 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 2.5 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 2.5 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 95 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 32 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 384 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price-Value Score | 100 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Speed Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 56.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 28.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 14 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 33/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Check out the Xeon E5-2620! This Server processor is a key player in Intel's high-end lineup. Unleashed in 2012, it's loaded with 6 cores and 12 threads. It has a base clock speed of 2GHz, can turbo up to 2.5GHz, and has a power draw of 95W, ready to elevate your gaming experience. The Xeon E5-2620 is a result of the Sandy Bridge-EP 32nm technology and is a part of the celebrated Xeon E5 series.
Can the Intel Xeon E5-2620 finally dethrone the king of mainstream CPUs, the Opteron 4332 HE? It's a maybe. The Xeon E5-2620 doesn't quite reach the same single-core performance as its rival, but more games are starting to use all those threads, so who cares!
Introducing the Xeon E5-2620, the high-performance counterpart to the award-winning Xeon E5-2609. Both are built on the same 32nm Sandy Bridge-EP platform, but the Xeon E5-2620 cranks the power up to a toasty 95W for those extra cores and threads. We're expecting big things from this one, just like its lower-powered sibling! 'sChoiceHype
We already went deep into the nitty-gritty details of the Sandy Bridge-EP chip design in our reviews of the Intel Xeon E5-2630 and Xeon E5-2609. If you want to learn more about the Xeon E5-2620's architecture (which is identical to the Xeon E5-2609), head over there!
But for most gamers who also do other stuff on their PC besides gaming, the Xeon E5-2620 is a better overall choice. It offers double the threads compared to the similarly priced Opteron 4332 HE, and those extra threads come in handy for tasks like editing and encoding videos. The Xeon E5 chips have always been great for these workloads, and Intel's recent improvements to AVX performance are super impressive.
The high number of threads (over 7!) in the Intel Xeon E5-2620 makes it a monster for tasks that use all the cores at once (multi-threaded workloads), especially for the price. If you edit a lot of videos or work with giant spreadsheets, the Xeon E5-2620 will give you a noticeable performance boost.
Today's review is on the Intel Xeon E5-2620, a 6-core desktop processor launched in Apr 2012. Intel sells the Xeon E5-2620 without integrated graphics, making it perfect for systems with a dedicated graphics card. It costs $36 and is a great option for those who already have a GPU.
The top-of-the-line Intel Xeon E5-2620 is a beast! This high-end CPU packs 6 cores and a whopping 12 threads. It clocks in at 2GHz base speed and can boost up to 2.5GHz. It beats everything in its path, including AMD's Opteron and Opteron processors, and even outperforms the 6-core series.
For a 6-core CPU, the Intel Xeon E5-2620 is a steal at $36! It seems crazy cheap compared to its main competitor, the 6-core AMD Opteron 4332 HE which costs $469.36. Basically, you get extra cores for almost nothing.
However, the Intel Xeon E5-2620 falls a bit behind in clock speeds. The Opteron 4334 can reach 3.1GHz base clock and boost up to 3.1GHz.
Looking for an affordable powerhouse CPU for work and play? Look no further than the Xeon E5-2620!
Building on the success of mainstream Xeon E5 CPUs, Intel is now attacking the high-end market with the Xeon E5-2620 processors, available since Apr 2012.
The Intel Xeon E5-2620 has a base clock of 2 GHz that can boost up to 2.5 GHz for lightly threaded tasks. It also maintains a clock rate of 2 GHz even when all cores are running. On the other hand, the AMD Opteron 4332 HE is stuck at a constant 3 GHz.
Which GPU to Pick for Intel Xeon E5-2620
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Xeon E5-2620.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.7 | 70.6 FPS
|
86.8 FPS
|
61.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 8.5 | 129.5 FPS
|
159.4 FPS
|
109.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 3.8 | 70 FPS
|
86.3 FPS
|
60.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 6.3 | 142.5 FPS
|
175.4 FPS
|
120.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 6.4 | 156.8 FPS
|
192.9 FPS
|
133.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 15.7 | 127.4 FPS
|
159.5 FPS
|
121 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3.3 | 61.1 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
55.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 4.3 | 70.1 FPS
|
87.2 FPS
|
64.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.1 | 78.3 FPS
|
96.9 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 5.3 | 113.8 FPS
|
139.1 FPS
|
104.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 5.5 | 144.6 FPS
|
181.1 FPS
|
137.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 8 | 150.5 FPS
|
188.5 FPS
|
143 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.9 | 162.1 FPS
|
203.2 FPS
|
154 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 9.2 | 173.7 FPS
|
217.7 FPS
|
165 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 10.1 | 14.8 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 14.3 | 19.5 FPS
|
23.3 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 12.4 | 20.1 FPS
|
23.9 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 29.1 | 51.6 FPS
|
61 FPS
|
45.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.3 | 13.2 FPS
|
13.7 FPS
|
9.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 28.9 | 34.6 FPS
|
40.4 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 10 | 14.9 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
11.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 10 | 20 FPS
|
23.6 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 10.2 | 22.4 FPS
|
26.5 FPS
|
18.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 10.9 | 30.3 FPS
|
36 FPS
|
24.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 13.2 | 32.4 FPS
|
39.5 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 16.3 | 33.7 FPS
|
41.1 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 16.6 | 39.2 FPS
|
48.9 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 18.2 | 35.7 FPS
|
43.7 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 10.5 | 15.2 FPS
|
17.7 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 10.3 | 19.3 FPS
|
22.7 FPS
|
15.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 10.5 | 31.4 FPS
|
36.4 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 14.8 | 37 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 15 | 43.2 FPS
|
51.4 FPS
|
36 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 20.1 | 49.6 FPS
|
58.7 FPS
|
41.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 10.2 | 13.7 FPS
|
16 FPS
|
11.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 6.7 | 26.7 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
22.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 13.1 | 30.5 FPS
|
36.7 FPS
|
26.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 8.3 | 48.2 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
41 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.7 | 51.5 FPS
|
62.6 FPS
|
43.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 7.7 | 10.3 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 42.8 | 70.1 FPS
|
87.6 FPS
|
64.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 18.9 | 63.6 FPS
|
77.9 FPS
|
56.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 7.3 | 10.8 FPS
|
12.7 FPS
|
8.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 5.3 | 37.2 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.1 | 33.3 FPS
|
38.8 FPS
|
26.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 6.4 | 15.5 FPS
|
18.1 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 5.2 | 53.5 FPS
|
64.6 FPS
|
45.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.7 | 29.9 FPS
|
35.6 FPS
|
24.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 6.2 | 56.7 FPS
|
69 FPS
|
48.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.4 | 61.9 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
52.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 6.3 | 36.2 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
28.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 6.8 | 40.9 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
32.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 10.1 | 16.8 FPS
|
19.7 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 8.6 | 19.7 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
16.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 7.6 | 33.6 FPS
|
39.4 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 5.3 | 31.9 FPS
|
37.5 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 8.5 | 47 FPS
|
55.8 FPS
|
38.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 8 | 51 FPS
|
61.1 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.1 | 55.1 FPS
|
66 FPS
|
46.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 11.7 | 64.8 FPS
|
80.7 FPS
|
57.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 5.2 | 28.6 FPS
|
34 FPS
|
23.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 4.3 | 37.5 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
31.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 5.1 | 43.1 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
36.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 5 | 45.8 FPS
|
54.9 FPS
|
38.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 5.8 | 48.5 FPS
|
58.2 FPS
|
40.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 6.4 | 54.4 FPS
|
62.3 FPS
|
43.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 6.9 | 57.8 FPS
|
67.7 FPS
|
48.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.2 | 61.1 FPS
|
72.8 FPS
|
52.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7.7 | 64.4 FPS
|
77.9 FPS
|
55.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 10.1 | 69.2 FPS
|
84.6 FPS
|
59.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 9.5 | 73.2 FPS
|
90.4 FPS
|
64.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 16.1 | 80.6 FPS
|
100.7 FPS
|
72.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 30.2 | 82.8 FPS
|
103.4 FPS
|
74.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 11 | 63.6 FPS
|
77.3 FPS
|
54.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 5.7 | 66.2 FPS
|
81.1 FPS
|
56.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 6 | 79.6 FPS
|
97.5 FPS
|
67.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 6.1 | 94.6 FPS
|
115 FPS
|
80.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 5.4 | 119.4 FPS
|
145.2 FPS
|
101.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 7.9 | 126.8 FPS
|
154.2 FPS
|
108.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 5 | 49.9 FPS
|
59.4 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 5.4 | 60.6 FPS
|
73.5 FPS
|
52.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.4 | 73.9 FPS
|
91.7 FPS
|
66.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 90.2 FPS
|
109 FPS
|
77.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 5.9 | 101.2 FPS
|
123.3 FPS
|
89.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 5.9 | 117.9 FPS
|
142.5 FPS
|
101.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 6.8 | 117.9 FPS
|
145.4 FPS
|
107.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 11.1 | 135.3 FPS
|
163.5 FPS
|
116.7 FPS
|
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.