| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1150 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2014 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 171 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 2 Cores | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 2 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.2 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.2 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 3.2 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 53 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 22 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 28.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 61 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 30.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 15.3 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 23/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Get to know the Pentium G3250! This Desktop processor is a beast in Intel's entry-level series. Launched in 2014, it's armed with 2 cores and 2 threads. It runs at a base frequency of 3.2GHz, can boost up to 3.2GHz, and has a power requirement of 53W, ready to power up your gaming rig. The Pentium G3250 is a product of the Haswell Refresh 22nm process and is a part of the acclaimed Pentium series.
And guess what? The Pentium G3250 is the ultimate successor to Intel's previous-gen gaming champion, the Pentium E2200. The Pentium E2200 was based on the legendary Conroe and 65nm process, and it made its grand entrance into the gaming scene back in 2009. But now, it's time for the Pentium G3250 to take the throne and conquer the gaming world!
Heads up, with a simple overclock, the Pentium G3240 can actually perform almost as well as the Pentium G3250, even when the Pentium G3250 is overclocked too. But the Pentium G3240 is $70 cheaper! Don't get us wrong, the Pentium G3250 is still a beast and offers more overall performance than AMD's A6-7470K, but if you're on a budget, the cheaper sibling might be the better call.
We already went deep into the nitty-gritty details of the Haswell Refresh chip design in our reviews of the Intel Pentium G3258 and Pentium G3240. If you want to learn more about the Pentium G3250's architecture (which is identical to the Pentium G3240), head over there!
The Pentium G3250 is the more expensive version of the Pentium G3240, and it shows with its higher base and boost clock speeds: 3.2 GHz and 3.2 GHz, respectively. That's a nice boost in speed, but the real game changer is the higher power delivery (PPT). This lets the motherboard pump more juice (up to 142W) to the Pentium G3250 compared to the Pentium G3240's limit of 53W. This extra power allows the Pentium G3250 to crank up the boost clocks even more aggressively, on both single and multiple cores. That means the performance gap between these two CPUs might be bigger than what the specs on paper suggest.
The Intel Pentium G3250 launched on Sep 2014 for $171, which is pretty much the same price as the last-generation Pentium E2200. At least there's no crazy price hike this generation!
Heads up! If you already have a Pentium E2200, this new generation doesn't offer a huge jump in performance. You might be better off waiting a year to upgrade or spending more on a higher-end CPU.
For gamers, both the A6-7470K and Pentium G3250 are great choices. They're neck and neck, with a slight edge to the AMD CPU if you don't overclock it. The Pentium G3250's base performance can be achieved with cheaper RAM (around $90), whereas the A6-7470K needs faster RAM ($110-$120) to hit the frame rates we showed. The price difference is small though, and with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 graphics card, your GPU will bottleneck your performance anyway. BottleneckAtPlay
One of the best things about the Intel Pentium G3250 is that it comes with a free CPU cooler! You can grab the Pentium G3250 for $171 without having to spend extra on cooling.
The Intel Pentium G3250 comes with a basic heatsink cooler, nothing fancy. But it gets the job done for this low-power CPU (TDP of 53W). You won't need a fancy aftermarket cooler unless you want to overclock it.
The Intel Pentium G3250 is a decent performing chip for $171. The main competitor at this price point is the A6-7470K, a 2-core unlocked processor with integrated graphics, which costs $215.7.
The Intel Pentium G3250 might not get a lot of hype, but it's a solid entry-level option that delivers a good experience for casual users.
If you don't care too much about overclocking and max boost speeds, then the Intel Pentium G3240 is a good option for $167.72. It also has 2 cores and 2 threads, but with slightly lower clock speeds (3.1GHz base and 3.1GHz boost).
Building on the success of mainstream Pentium CPUs, Intel is now attacking the entry-level market with the Pentium G3250 processors, available since Sep 2014.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Pentium G3250.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.4 | 62.7 FPS
|
83.9 FPS
|
60.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 9.5 | 115.1 FPS
|
154.1 FPS
|
108.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4.3 | 62.2 FPS
|
83.4 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 7.1 | 126.6 FPS
|
169.5 FPS
|
119.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 7.2 | 139.3 FPS
|
186.4 FPS
|
131.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 17.7 | 113.1 FPS
|
154.2 FPS
|
119.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3.7 | 54.3 FPS
|
72.7 FPS
|
54.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 4.8 | 62.3 FPS
|
84.3 FPS
|
63.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.7 | 69.6 FPS
|
93.7 FPS
|
70.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 5.9 | 101.1 FPS
|
134.4 FPS
|
102.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 6.2 | 128.5 FPS
|
175.1 FPS
|
135.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 9 | 133.7 FPS
|
182.2 FPS
|
140.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.5 | 144 FPS
|
196.4 FPS
|
151.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 10.4 | 154.3 FPS
|
210.4 FPS
|
162.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.3 | 13.2 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
11.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 16.1 | 17.3 FPS
|
22.5 FPS
|
15.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 13.9 | 17.9 FPS
|
23.1 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 32.7 | 45.8 FPS
|
58.9 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 12.7 | 11.7 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
9.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 32.5 | 30.7 FPS
|
39.1 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.2 | 13.3 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
11.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.2 | 17.8 FPS
|
22.9 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 11.5 | 19.9 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
18.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 12.2 | 26.9 FPS
|
34.8 FPS
|
23.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 14.9 | 28.8 FPS
|
38.1 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 18.4 | 29.9 FPS
|
39.8 FPS
|
28.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 18.6 | 34.8 FPS
|
47.3 FPS
|
34.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 20.5 | 31.7 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 11.8 | 13.5 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
12.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.6 | 17.1 FPS
|
21.9 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 11.8 | 27.9 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
26.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 16.7 | 32.9 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
30.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 16.9 | 38.4 FPS
|
49.7 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 22.7 | 44.1 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 11.5 | 12.2 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 7.6 | 23.7 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
21.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 14.8 | 27.1 FPS
|
35.5 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.3 | 42.9 FPS
|
56.6 FPS
|
40.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.9 | 45.7 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.6 | 9.2 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
7.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 48.1 | 62.3 FPS
|
84.6 FPS
|
63.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 21.2 | 56.5 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
56 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.2 | 9.6 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
8.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 6 | 33 FPS
|
41.8 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.7 | 29.6 FPS
|
37.5 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 7.2 | 13.8 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 5.9 | 47.5 FPS
|
62.4 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.4 | 26.6 FPS
|
34.4 FPS
|
24 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 6.9 | 50.4 FPS
|
66.7 FPS
|
47.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.3 | 55 FPS
|
72.7 FPS
|
51.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 7.1 | 32.2 FPS
|
40.7 FPS
|
28.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 7.7 | 36.3 FPS
|
45.9 FPS
|
32.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 11.3 | 14.9 FPS
|
19.1 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 9.7 | 17.5 FPS
|
22.6 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 8.5 | 29.9 FPS
|
38.1 FPS
|
27.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 6 | 28.3 FPS
|
36.2 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.6 | 41.7 FPS
|
53.9 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 9 | 45.3 FPS
|
59.1 FPS
|
42.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.2 | 48.9 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
45.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 13.2 | 57.6 FPS
|
78 FPS
|
56.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 5.9 | 25.4 FPS
|
32.8 FPS
|
23.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 4.8 | 33.3 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
30.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 5.7 | 38.3 FPS
|
49.9 FPS
|
35.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 5.6 | 40.6 FPS
|
53.1 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.5 | 43.1 FPS
|
56.2 FPS
|
40.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 7.2 | 48.3 FPS
|
60.2 FPS
|
42.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.8 | 51.4 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
47.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.2 | 54.3 FPS
|
70.3 FPS
|
51.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.7 | 57.2 FPS
|
75.3 FPS
|
54.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11.4 | 61.4 FPS
|
81.8 FPS
|
59 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 10.8 | 65 FPS
|
87.4 FPS
|
63.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 18.1 | 71.6 FPS
|
97.3 FPS
|
71.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 34 | 73.6 FPS
|
99.9 FPS
|
73.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 12.4 | 56.5 FPS
|
74.8 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 6.4 | 58.8 FPS
|
78.4 FPS
|
56 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 6.8 | 70.7 FPS
|
94.2 FPS
|
66.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 6.9 | 84 FPS
|
111.1 FPS
|
79.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 6.1 | 106.1 FPS
|
140.3 FPS
|
100.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 8.9 | 112.7 FPS
|
149 FPS
|
106.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 5.6 | 44.3 FPS
|
57.4 FPS
|
41.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 6.1 | 53.9 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
52.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.1 | 65.7 FPS
|
88.7 FPS
|
65.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.2 | 80.1 FPS
|
105.4 FPS
|
76.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 6.7 | 89.9 FPS
|
119.2 FPS
|
88.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 6.7 | 104.7 FPS
|
137.8 FPS
|
100.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 7.6 | 104.8 FPS
|
140.5 FPS
|
106 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 12.5 | 120.2 FPS
|
158.1 FPS
|
114.9 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.