AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 7 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2017 Model | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 219 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 12 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.2 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.6 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 3.9 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 64 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 85.7 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 39 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 19.5 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 9.7 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 38/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Behold the Ryzen 5 1600! This Desktop processor is a gem in AMD's mid-range collection. Debuted in 2017, it's equipped with 6 cores and 12 threads. With a base clock speed of 3.2GHz, a turbo speed of 3.6GHz, and a power consumption of 65W, it's primed to boost your gaming performance. The Ryzen 5 1600 is engineered on the Summit Ridge 14nm platform and belongs to the renowned Ryzen 5 series.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is another epic drop from Team AMD, cranking things up in the neverending AMD vs Intel CPU war. But hey, core count ain't everything, especially for playing the hottest PC games. Single-core performance gotta be on point too.
Can the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 finally dethrone the king of mainstream CPUs, the Core i5-7600? It's a maybe. The Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't quite reach the same single-core performance as its rival, but more games are starting to use all those threads, so who cares!
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 flexes its muscles when it comes to multi-threaded tasks. In Geekbench and Cinebench R15, this 6-core monster scored a whopping 20754 and 1094 respectively. Compared to the Core i5-7600 with scores of 13135 and 666 in the same tests, it's a total blowout. For pretty much the same price, the Ryzen 5 1600 crushes the Core i5-7600 in multi-threaded workloads. Boom!
AMD just unleashed its Zen architecture, raising the stakes in the high-stakes battle for desktop PC dominance against Intel. This new lineup of chips pushes core counts and raw power to crazy high levels, threatening Intel's reign for the first time in a decade. Buckle up, it's about to get intense!
Heads up, with a simple overclock, the Ryzen 5 1500X can actually perform almost as well as the Ryzen 5 1600, even when the Ryzen 5 1600 is overclocked too. But the Ryzen 5 1500X is $70 cheaper! Don't get us wrong, the Ryzen 5 1600 is still a beast and offers more overall performance than Intel's Core i5-7500, but if you're on a budget, the cheaper sibling might be the better call.
Alright, listen up. When it comes to pure gaming performance, Intel still holds the crown. If squeezing out every last frame per second is your top priority, then a Intel CPU might be the better choice. But here's the thing: that advantage shrinks at higher resolutions or if you pair the CPU with a less powerful graphics card. mattersToo
For gamers on a budget who aren't afraid of a little overclocking and have decent cooling, the Ryzen 5 1500X is a solid option. You can get pretty much the same performance as the Ryzen 5 1600 (especially for gaming) by overclocking it a bit. Plus, it's cheaper! This is why we gave the Ryzen 5 1500X an Editor's Choice award.
Straight out of the box, the Ryzen 5 1600 is a better all-rounder than the Core i5-7600. It offers slightly better performance than its cheaper sibling, the Ryzen 5 1500X, and comes with a free cooler which saves you money on the build. Plus, there are tons of motherboards compatible with it, so you have plenty of options to choose from.
The high number of threads (over 7!) in the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 makes it a monster for tasks that use all the cores at once (multi-threaded workloads), especially for the price. If you edit a lot of videos or work with giant spreadsheets, the Ryzen 5 1600 will give you a noticeable performance boost.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is another impressive addition to AMD's 1 Gen of Ryzen 5 processors. It boasts 6 cores and 12 threads, with a boost clock of up to 3.6 GHz. While the specs might not look super top-of-the-line on paper, the real-world performance you get for your $219 is fantastic.
For gamers, both the Core i5-7600 and Ryzen 5 1600 are great choices. They're neck and neck, with a slight edge to the Intel CPU if you don't overclock it. The Ryzen 5 1600's base performance can be achieved with cheaper RAM (around $90), whereas the Core i5-7600 needs faster RAM ($110-$120) to hit the frame rates we showed. The price difference is small though, and with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 graphics card, your GPU will bottleneck your performance anyway. BottleneckAtPlay
Today's review is on the AMD Ryzen 5 1600, a 6-core desktop processor launched in Mar 2017. AMD sells the Ryzen 5 1600 without integrated graphics, making it perfect for systems with a dedicated graphics card. It costs $219 and is a great option for those who already have a GPU.
One of the best things about the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is that it comes with a free CPU cooler! You can grab the Ryzen 5 1600 for $219 without having to spend extra on cooling.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 comes with a basic heatsink cooler, nothing fancy. But it gets the job done for this low-power CPU (TDP of 65W). You won't need a fancy aftermarket cooler unless you want to overclock it.
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is a decent performing chip for $219. The main competitor at this price point is the Core i5-7600, a 4-core unlocked processor with integrated graphics, which costs $224.
For a 6-core CPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is a steal at $219! It seems crazy cheap compared to its main competitor, the 4-core Intel Core i5-7600 which costs $224. Basically, you get extra cores for almost nothing.
The launch of Ryzen 5 wasn't perfect. Some gamers experienced performance issues and the CPUs ran a bit hot. But after a month of optimizations, driver updates, and BIOS fixes, Ryzen 5 seems to be running smoothly now.
The Ryzen 5 1600 is a great choice for both gaming and content creation, thanks to its high performance (0.97%) and at least 12 threads. Live streaming, eSports, and uploading gameplay videos are becoming increasingly popular, and this CPU can handle it all.
The Ryzen 5 1600 boosts up to the advertised 3.6 GHz, and with AMD's software you can push one core even higher to 3.6+0.1 GHz. But don't expect much beyond that without a serious cooler upgrade and manual voltage tweaks.
More cores, more power! The Ryzen 5 1600's 6 cores outperform everything Intel throws at it, including both the competitor's closest rival and a higher-end model.
Looking for an affordable powerhouse CPU for work and play? Look no further than the Ryzen 5 1600!
Building on the success of mainstream Ryzen 5 CPUs, AMD is now attacking the mid-range market with the Ryzen 5 1600 processors, available since Mar 2017.
Intel's Core i5 CPUs are super popular for budget and mid-range builds. But AMD is shaking things up with 6-core processors that cost even less than 4-core options from Intel. Plus, Ryzen 5 CPUs are unlocked for overclocking, giving you even more performance potential. Intel might have a tough time competing with this!
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is priced at $219, which is a great deal compared to the almost $224 Intel Core i5-7600. With 6 cores, the Ryzen 5 1600 will outperform Intel's 4 core CPU in tasks that use multiple cores. While you don't get integrated graphics like Intel, most enthusiast gamers building a cheap PC won't need it anyway.
Which GPU to Pick for AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.1 | 98.1 FPS
|
97.2 FPS
|
64.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6.1 | 180 FPS
|
178.4 FPS
|
115.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.8 | 97.3 FPS
|
96.6 FPS
|
63.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.5 | 198 FPS
|
196.3 FPS
|
126.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.6 | 217.8 FPS
|
215.9 FPS
|
139.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 11.3 | 177 FPS
|
178.6 FPS
|
127 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.4 | 84.9 FPS
|
84.3 FPS
|
58.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3.1 | 97.4 FPS
|
97.7 FPS
|
67.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.7 | 108.8 FPS
|
108.5 FPS
|
74.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.8 | 158.2 FPS
|
155.7 FPS
|
109.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 4 | 201 FPS
|
202.8 FPS
|
144.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.7 | 209.2 FPS
|
211.1 FPS
|
150.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.5 | 225.2 FPS
|
227.5 FPS
|
161.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.6 | 241.4 FPS
|
243.7 FPS
|
173.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.2 | 20.6 FPS
|
18 FPS
|
12.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 10.3 | 27.1 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.9 | 28 FPS
|
26.7 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 20.9 | 71.7 FPS
|
68.2 FPS
|
47.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8.1 | 18.4 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
10.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 20.8 | 48.1 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.2 | 20.7 FPS
|
18.6 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.2 | 27.8 FPS
|
26.5 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7.3 | 31.2 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.8 | 42.1 FPS
|
40.3 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.5 | 45.1 FPS
|
44.2 FPS
|
29.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.7 | 46.8 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
30.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.9 | 54.5 FPS
|
54.7 FPS
|
36.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 13.1 | 49.5 FPS
|
48.9 FPS
|
32.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.5 | 21.1 FPS
|
19.8 FPS
|
13.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.4 | 26.8 FPS
|
25.4 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.5 | 43.6 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.7 | 51.4 FPS
|
48.8 FPS
|
32.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.8 | 60 FPS
|
57.6 FPS
|
37.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 14.5 | 68.9 FPS
|
65.7 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7.4 | 19 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
11.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.8 | 37.1 FPS
|
35.7 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9.4 | 42.4 FPS
|
41.1 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6 | 67 FPS
|
65.6 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 7 | 71.5 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
46 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.5 | 14.4 FPS
|
13.5 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 30.8 | 97.5 FPS
|
98 FPS
|
67.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 13.6 | 88.3 FPS
|
87.2 FPS
|
59.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.3 | 15 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
9.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.9 | 51.6 FPS
|
48.4 FPS
|
31 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.7 | 46.3 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.6 | 21.6 FPS
|
20.2 FPS
|
13 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.8 | 74.4 FPS
|
72.3 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.1 | 41.5 FPS
|
39.8 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.4 | 78.8 FPS
|
77.3 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.6 | 86 FPS
|
84.3 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.5 | 50.4 FPS
|
47.1 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.9 | 56.8 FPS
|
53.2 FPS
|
34.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 7.3 | 23.3 FPS
|
22.1 FPS
|
14.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.2 | 27.4 FPS
|
26.2 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.4 | 46.7 FPS
|
44.1 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.8 | 44.3 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.1 | 65.3 FPS
|
62.4 FPS
|
40.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.8 | 70.9 FPS
|
68.4 FPS
|
44.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.5 | 76.5 FPS
|
73.9 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8.4 | 90.1 FPS
|
90.3 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.8 | 39.7 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
24.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3.1 | 52.1 FPS
|
50.2 FPS
|
32.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.7 | 59.8 FPS
|
57.8 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.6 | 63.6 FPS
|
61.4 FPS
|
40.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.1 | 67.4 FPS
|
65.1 FPS
|
42.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.6 | 75.6 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
45.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 5 | 80.3 FPS
|
75.8 FPS
|
50.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.9 | 84.9 FPS
|
81.5 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.6 | 89.5 FPS
|
87.2 FPS
|
58.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.3 | 96.1 FPS
|
94.7 FPS
|
62.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.9 | 101.7 FPS
|
101.3 FPS
|
67.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11.6 | 112 FPS
|
112.7 FPS
|
75.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 21.7 | 115.1 FPS
|
115.7 FPS
|
78 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.9 | 88.3 FPS
|
86.6 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.1 | 92 FPS
|
90.8 FPS
|
59.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.3 | 110.6 FPS
|
109.1 FPS
|
70.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.4 | 131.4 FPS
|
128.7 FPS
|
84.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.9 | 165.9 FPS
|
162.5 FPS
|
107 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.7 | 176.2 FPS
|
172.6 FPS
|
113.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.6 | 69.3 FPS
|
66.5 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.9 | 84.2 FPS
|
82.3 FPS
|
55.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.9 | 102.7 FPS
|
102.7 FPS
|
70 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4 | 125.3 FPS
|
122.1 FPS
|
81.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.3 | 140.6 FPS
|
138 FPS
|
94 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.3 | 163.8 FPS
|
159.6 FPS
|
106.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.9 | 163.9 FPS
|
162.8 FPS
|
113 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 8 | 188 FPS
|
183.1 FPS
|
122.5 FPS
|
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.