| Category | Server | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | high-end | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | P3 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
| Cooler Included | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
| Overclock Potential | 1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2017 Model | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 2100 USD | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 32 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Threads | 64 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Core Frequency | 2 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 3 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 180 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 4096 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price-Value Score | 57 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 38.4 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 19.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 9.6 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 38/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Discover the Epyc 7551P! This Server processor is a star in AMD's high-end portfolio. Released in 2017, it sports 32 cores and 64 threads. It has a base frequency of 2GHz, can reach up to 3GHz, and has a power rating of 180W, ready to enhance your gaming rig. The Epyc 7551P is built using the Rome 14nm process and is a part of the esteemed EPYC series.
The AMD Epyc 7551P is another epic drop from Team AMD, cranking things up in the neverending AMD vs Intel CPU war. But hey, core count ain't everything, especially for playing the hottest PC games. Single-core performance gotta be on point too.
Can the AMD Epyc 7551P finally dethrone the king of mainstream CPUs, the Xeon Platinum 8160? It's a maybe. The Epyc 7551P doesn't quite reach the same single-core performance as its rival, but more games are starting to use all those threads, so who cares!
The AMD Epyc 7551P is an absolute monster, just like its 32 cores, 64 threads, and hefty price tag suggest. This is the top dog of mainstream processors, the king you've been waiting for. Games, video editing, 3D work – the Epyc 7551P handles it all with ease. Bow down to the king!
Heads up though, there are still a few tasks where the Xeon Platinum 8160 might perform a bit better. Think super old, single-threaded games like World of Warcraft. But even that gap is closing in fast. catching up!
The past few years, AMD has been clawing its way to the top of the desktop CPU game, and with the AMD Epyc 7551P, they've finally reached the peak. Move over Intel, there's a new sheriff in town!
AMD just unleashed its Zen architecture, raising the stakes in the high-stakes battle for desktop PC dominance against Intel. This new lineup of chips pushes core counts and raw power to crazy high levels, threatening Intel's reign for the first time in a decade. Buckle up, it's about to get intense!
The Epyc 7551P sits just below the mighty Epyc 7601 with its fancy 14nm compute die and beefy 32 cores and 64 threads. While the Epyc 7601 might seem like the obvious winner, AMD has done some magic to keep the Epyc 7551P's single compute die design efficient. Plus, the higher TDP allows for more aggressive boost clocks. This means the Epyc 7551P could actually compete with the Epyc 7601 in some games – who knew?
We already went deep into the nitty-gritty details of the Zen chip design in our reviews of the AMD Epyc 7601 and Epyc 7501. If you want to learn more about the Epyc 7551P's architecture (which is identical to the Epyc 7501), head over there!
Alright, listen up. When it comes to pure gaming performance, Intel still holds the crown. If squeezing out every last frame per second is your top priority, then a Intel CPU might be the better choice. But here's the thing: that advantage shrinks at higher resolutions or if you pair the CPU with a less powerful graphics card. mattersToo
For gamers on a budget who aren't afraid of a little overclocking and have decent cooling, the Epyc 7501 is a solid option. You can get pretty much the same performance as the Epyc 7551P (especially for gaming) by overclocking it a bit. Plus, it's cheaper! This is why we gave the Epyc 7501 an Editor's Choice award.
The high number of threads (over 7!) in the AMD Epyc 7551P makes it a monster for tasks that use all the cores at once (multi-threaded workloads), especially for the price. If you edit a lot of videos or work with giant spreadsheets, the Epyc 7551P will give you a noticeable performance boost.
For gamers, both the Xeon Platinum 8160 and Epyc 7551P are great choices. They're neck and neck, with a slight edge to the Intel CPU if you don't overclock it. The Epyc 7551P's base performance can be achieved with cheaper RAM (around $90), whereas the Xeon Platinum 8160 needs faster RAM ($110-$120) to hit the frame rates we showed. The price difference is small though, and with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 graphics card, your GPU will bottleneck your performance anyway. BottleneckAtPlay
The top-of-the-line AMD Epyc 7551P is a beast! This high-end CPU packs 32 cores and a whopping 64 threads. It clocks in at 2GHz base speed and can boost up to 3GHz. It beats everything in its path, including Intel's Xeon Platinum and Xeon Platinum processors, and even outperforms the 32-core series.
The Epyc 7551P is a great choice for both gaming and content creation, thanks to its high performance (0.98%) and at least 12 threads. Live streaming, eSports, and uploading gameplay videos are becoming increasingly popular, and this CPU can handle it all.
The Epyc 7551P boosts up to the advertised 3 GHz, and with AMD's software you can push one core even higher to 3+0.1 GHz. But don't expect much beyond that without a serious cooler upgrade and manual voltage tweaks.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Epyc 7551P.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4 | 99 FPS
|
97.6 FPS
|
64.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 6 | 181.7 FPS
|
179.1 FPS
|
115.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.7 | 98.3 FPS
|
97 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 4.5 | 200 FPS
|
197.1 FPS
|
127.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 4.5 | 220 FPS
|
216.7 FPS
|
139.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 11.2 | 178.7 FPS
|
179.3 FPS
|
127.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2.3 | 85.7 FPS
|
84.6 FPS
|
58.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 3 | 98.4 FPS
|
98 FPS
|
67.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.6 | 109.9 FPS
|
108.9 FPS
|
74.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.8 | 159.7 FPS
|
156.3 FPS
|
109.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.9 | 202.9 FPS
|
203.5 FPS
|
144.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 5.7 | 211.2 FPS
|
211.9 FPS
|
150.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.5 | 227.4 FPS
|
228.3 FPS
|
161.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 6.6 | 243.7 FPS
|
244.6 FPS
|
173.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.2 | 20.8 FPS
|
18 FPS
|
12.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 10.2 | 27.4 FPS
|
26.2 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 8.8 | 28.3 FPS
|
26.8 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 20.7 | 72.4 FPS
|
68.5 FPS
|
47.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 8.1 | 18.5 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
10.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 20.6 | 48.5 FPS
|
45.4 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 7.1 | 20.9 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
12.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.1 | 28.1 FPS
|
26.6 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 7.3 | 31.5 FPS
|
29.8 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 7.7 | 42.5 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
25.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 9.4 | 45.5 FPS
|
44.4 FPS
|
29.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 11.6 | 47.3 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
30.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.8 | 55 FPS
|
54.9 FPS
|
37 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 13 | 50 FPS
|
49.1 FPS
|
32.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 7.4 | 21.4 FPS
|
19.8 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 7.4 | 27 FPS
|
25.5 FPS
|
16.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 7.5 | 44 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10.6 | 51.9 FPS
|
49 FPS
|
32.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 10.7 | 60.6 FPS
|
57.8 FPS
|
37.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 14.4 | 69.6 FPS
|
66 FPS
|
43.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 7.3 | 19.2 FPS
|
18 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.8 | 37.4 FPS
|
35.8 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 9.3 | 42.8 FPS
|
41.3 FPS
|
27.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.9 | 67.7 FPS
|
65.8 FPS
|
43.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.9 | 72.2 FPS
|
70.4 FPS
|
46 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.4 | 14.5 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
8.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 30.5 | 98.4 FPS
|
98.4 FPS
|
67.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 13.4 | 89.2 FPS
|
87.5 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 5.2 | 15.2 FPS
|
14.3 FPS
|
9.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.8 | 52.2 FPS
|
48.6 FPS
|
31 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.6 | 46.7 FPS
|
43.6 FPS
|
27.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 4.5 | 21.8 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
13.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.7 | 75.1 FPS
|
72.5 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4 | 42 FPS
|
40 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 4.4 | 79.6 FPS
|
77.6 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.6 | 86.9 FPS
|
84.6 FPS
|
55.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 4.5 | 50.9 FPS
|
47.3 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.9 | 57.4 FPS
|
53.4 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 7.2 | 23.5 FPS
|
22.2 FPS
|
14.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.1 | 27.7 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
17.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 5.4 | 47.2 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
29 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.8 | 44.8 FPS
|
42.1 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.1 | 65.9 FPS
|
62.7 FPS
|
40.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 5.7 | 71.6 FPS
|
68.7 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.5 | 77.3 FPS
|
74.2 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 8.3 | 91 FPS
|
90.7 FPS
|
60.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.7 | 40.1 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
24.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 3 | 52.6 FPS
|
50.4 FPS
|
32.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.6 | 60.4 FPS
|
58 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.6 | 64.2 FPS
|
61.7 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 4.1 | 68.1 FPS
|
65.4 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 4.6 | 76.3 FPS
|
70 FPS
|
45.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.9 | 81.1 FPS
|
76.1 FPS
|
50.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.8 | 85.7 FPS
|
81.8 FPS
|
55.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 90.4 FPS
|
87.5 FPS
|
58.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 7.2 | 97.1 FPS
|
95.1 FPS
|
63 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.8 | 102.7 FPS
|
101.6 FPS
|
67.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 11.5 | 113.1 FPS
|
113.1 FPS
|
75.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 21.5 | 116.2 FPS
|
116.2 FPS
|
78 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 7.8 | 89.2 FPS
|
86.9 FPS
|
57.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 4.1 | 92.9 FPS
|
91.1 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 4.3 | 111.7 FPS
|
109.5 FPS
|
70.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 4.4 | 132.7 FPS
|
129.2 FPS
|
84.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.9 | 167.6 FPS
|
163.1 FPS
|
107.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 5.6 | 178 FPS
|
173.3 FPS
|
113.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.6 | 70 FPS
|
66.7 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.9 | 85.1 FPS
|
82.6 FPS
|
55.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.8 | 103.7 FPS
|
103.1 FPS
|
70.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.9 | 126.6 FPS
|
122.5 FPS
|
81.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 4.2 | 142 FPS
|
138.5 FPS
|
94.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 4.2 | 165.4 FPS
|
160.2 FPS
|
106.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.8 | 165.5 FPS
|
163.4 FPS
|
113.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 7.9 | 189.9 FPS
|
183.8 FPS
|
122.6 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.