AMD A8-7650K Review
| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | entry-level | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | FM2+ | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 (on-die) | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 16 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2015 Model | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Price | 152 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 4 Cores | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 4 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 3.3 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.4 GHz | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 95 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 28 nm | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 32 GB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Price-Value Score | 64.5 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 55 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 33 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 70 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 60.4 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 30.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 15.1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 28/100 | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Check out the A8-7650K! This Desktop processor is a key player in AMD's entry-level lineup. Unleashed in 2015, it's loaded with 4 cores and 4 threads. It has a base clock speed of 3.3GHz, can turbo up to 3.8GHz, and has a power draw of 95W, ready to elevate your gaming experience. The A8-7650K is a result of the Kaveri 28nm technology and is a part of the celebrated A8 series.
And guess what? The A8-7650K is the ultimate successor to AMD's previous-gen gaming champion, the A8-6600K. The A8-6600K was based on the legendary Piledriver and 32nm process, and it made its grand entrance into the gaming scene back in 2013. But now, it's time for the A8-7650K to take the throne and conquer the gaming world!
The AMD A8-7650K is another epic drop from Team AMD, cranking things up in the neverending AMD vs Intel CPU war. But hey, core count ain't everything, especially for playing the hottest PC games. Single-core performance gotta be on point too.
The AMD A8 5th Generation boasts the Steamroller architecture, which brings 28nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But there's more to this story than just a smaller size. Get ready for some serious performance upgrades!
Oof, the single-core performance isn't quite as impressive, even though AMD is closer than ever to matching Intel core for core. In our single-core GeekBench and Cinebench tests, the A8-7650K scored a 1968 and 61 respectively. This is a massive leap from the A8-6600K, but it still falls behind the Core i3-4370, which scored a 4051 and 153 in the same tests. Don't worry though, the multi-core gains usually outweigh the single-core difference.
AMD just unleashed its Steamroller architecture, raising the stakes in the high-stakes battle for desktop PC dominance against Intel. This new lineup of chips pushes core counts and raw power to crazy high levels, threatening Intel's reign for the first time in a decade. Buckle up, it's about to get intense!
Introducing the A8-7650K, the high-performance counterpart to the award-winning A8-7600. Both are built on the same 28nm Steamroller platform, but the A8-7650K cranks the power up to a toasty 95W for those extra cores and threads. We're expecting big things from this one, just like its lower-powered sibling! 'sChoiceHype
Heads up, with a simple overclock, the A8-7600 can actually perform almost as well as the A8-7650K, even when the A8-7650K is overclocked too. But the A8-7600 is $70 cheaper! Don't get us wrong, the A8-7650K is still a beast and offers more overall performance than Intel's Core i3-4370, but if you're on a budget, the cheaper sibling might be the better call.
Alright, listen up. When it comes to pure gaming performance, Intel still holds the crown. If squeezing out every last frame per second is your top priority, then a Intel CPU might be the better choice. But here's the thing: that advantage shrinks at higher resolutions or if you pair the CPU with a less powerful graphics card. mattersToo
For gamers on a budget who aren't afraid of a little overclocking and have decent cooling, the A8-7600 is a solid option. You can get pretty much the same performance as the A8-7650K (especially for gaming) by overclocking it a bit. Plus, it's cheaper! This is why we gave the A8-7600 an Editor's Choice award.
The wait is finally over! The AMD A8 5 Gen is here, and the AMD A8-7650K might just be the perfect example of what this new generation brings to the table. It keeps the same core and thread count (4 cores and 4 threads) as its predecessor, the A8-6600K. But thanks to the new, smaller 28nm manufacturing process, it delivers significantly better performance while using less power.
The AMD A8-7650K launched on Feb 2015 for $152, which is pretty much the same price as the last-generation A8-6600K. At least there's no crazy price hike this generation!
Shrinking down to a 28nm process gives the A8-7650K a whopping 15% boost in IPC (instructions per clock). Basically, compared to a similar CPU from the last generation (A8 4 Gen) clocked at the same speed, you'll get 15% better performance. It might not be a huge difference in everyday tasks, but it's still something.
One of the best things about the AMD A8-7650K is that it comes with a free CPU cooler! You can grab the A8-7650K for $152 without having to spend extra on cooling.
The AMD A8-7650K comes with a basic heatsink cooler, nothing fancy. But it gets the job done for this low-power CPU (TDP of 95W). You won't need a fancy aftermarket cooler unless you want to overclock it.
The AMD A8-7650K is a decent performing chip for $152. The main competitor at this price point is the Core i3-4370, a 2-core unlocked processor with integrated graphics, which costs $242.
The AMD A8-7650K might not get a lot of hype, but it's a solid entry-level option that delivers a good experience for casual users.
If you don't care too much about overclocking and max boost speeds, then the AMD A8-7600 is a good option for $120.45. It also has 4 cores and 4 threads, but with slightly lower clock speeds (3.1GHz base and 3.8GHz boost).
The A8-7650K boosts up to the advertised 3.8 GHz, and with AMD's software you can push one core even higher to 3.8+0.1 GHz. But don't expect much beyond that without a serious cooler upgrade and manual voltage tweaks.
More cores, more power! The A8-7650K's 4 cores outperform everything Intel throws at it, including both the competitor's closest rival and a higher-end model.
Building on the success of mainstream A8 CPUs, AMD is now attacking the entry-level market with the A8-7650K processors, available since Feb 2015.
Intel's Core i3 CPUs are super popular for budget and mid-range builds. But AMD is shaking things up with 4-core processors that cost even less than 2-core options from Intel. Plus, A8 CPUs are unlocked for overclocking, giving you even more performance potential. Intel might have a tough time competing with this!
The AMD A8-7650K has a base clock of 3.3 GHz that can boost up to 3.8 GHz for lightly threaded tasks. It also maintains a clock rate of 3.3 GHz even when all cores are running. On the other hand, the Intel Core i3-4370 is stuck at a constant 3.8 GHz.
Which GPU to Pick for AMD A8-7650K
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD A8-7650K.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6.3 | 63.7 FPS
|
84.3 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 9.4 | 116.8 FPS
|
154.7 FPS
|
108.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 4.3 | 63.2 FPS
|
83.8 FPS
|
59.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 7 | 128.6 FPS
|
170.2 FPS
|
119.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 7.1 | 141.4 FPS
|
187.2 FPS
|
131.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 17.4 | 114.9 FPS
|
154.9 FPS
|
119.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 3.6 | 55.1 FPS
|
73.1 FPS
|
54.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 4.7 | 63.2 FPS
|
84.7 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.7 | 70.6 FPS
|
94.1 FPS
|
70.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 5.8 | 102.7 FPS
|
135 FPS
|
102.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 6.1 | 130.5 FPS
|
175.8 FPS
|
135.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 8.8 | 135.8 FPS
|
183 FPS
|
141.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 5.5 | 146.2 FPS
|
197.2 FPS
|
152.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 10.2 | 156.7 FPS
|
211.3 FPS
|
162.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11.1 | 13.4 FPS
|
15.6 FPS
|
11.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 15.9 | 17.6 FPS
|
22.6 FPS
|
15.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 13.7 | 18.2 FPS
|
23.2 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 32.2 | 46.6 FPS
|
59.2 FPS
|
45 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 12.5 | 11.9 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
9.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 32 | 31.2 FPS
|
39.2 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 11 | 13.5 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
11.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.1 | 18 FPS
|
23 FPS
|
15.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 11.3 | 20.2 FPS
|
25.7 FPS
|
18.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 12.1 | 27.3 FPS
|
35 FPS
|
23.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 14.6 | 29.3 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
27.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 18.1 | 30.4 FPS
|
39.9 FPS
|
28.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 18.3 | 35.4 FPS
|
47.5 FPS
|
34.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 20.2 | 32.2 FPS
|
42.4 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 11.6 | 13.7 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 11.4 | 17.4 FPS
|
22 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 11.6 | 28.3 FPS
|
35.4 FPS
|
26.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 16.4 | 33.4 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 16.7 | 38.9 FPS
|
49.9 FPS
|
35.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 22.3 | 44.7 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
40.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 11.3 | 12.4 FPS
|
15.5 FPS
|
10.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 7.4 | 24.1 FPS
|
30.9 FPS
|
22 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 14.5 | 27.5 FPS
|
35.7 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.2 | 43.5 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
40.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10.8 | 46.4 FPS
|
60.8 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.5 | 9.3 FPS
|
11.7 FPS
|
7.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 47.4 | 63.3 FPS
|
85 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 20.9 | 57.3 FPS
|
75.6 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 8.1 | 9.8 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
8.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 5.9 | 33.5 FPS
|
42 FPS
|
29.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.6 | 30.1 FPS
|
37.7 FPS
|
26.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 7.1 | 14 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 5.8 | 48.3 FPS
|
62.7 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 6.3 | 27 FPS
|
34.5 FPS
|
24.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 6.8 | 51.2 FPS
|
67 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 7.2 | 55.8 FPS
|
73.1 FPS
|
52.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 7 | 32.7 FPS
|
40.9 FPS
|
28.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 7.6 | 36.9 FPS
|
46.1 FPS
|
32.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 11.2 | 15.1 FPS
|
19.2 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 9.5 | 17.8 FPS
|
22.7 FPS
|
16.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 8.4 | 30.3 FPS
|
38.2 FPS
|
27.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 5.9 | 28.8 FPS
|
36.4 FPS
|
25.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 9.4 | 42.4 FPS
|
54.1 FPS
|
38.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 8.9 | 46 FPS
|
59.3 FPS
|
42.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 10 | 49.7 FPS
|
64.1 FPS
|
45.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 13 | 58.5 FPS
|
78.3 FPS
|
56.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 5.8 | 25.8 FPS
|
33 FPS
|
23.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 4.7 | 33.8 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
30.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 5.7 | 38.9 FPS
|
50.1 FPS
|
35.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 5.5 | 41.3 FPS
|
53.3 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 6.4 | 43.8 FPS
|
56.5 FPS
|
40.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 7.1 | 49.1 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
42.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 7.7 | 52.1 FPS
|
65.8 FPS
|
47.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 9.1 | 55.1 FPS
|
70.7 FPS
|
51.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 8.6 | 58.1 FPS
|
75.6 FPS
|
54.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 11.2 | 62.4 FPS
|
82.1 FPS
|
59.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 10.6 | 66 FPS
|
87.8 FPS
|
63.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 17.9 | 72.7 FPS
|
97.7 FPS
|
71.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 33.5 | 74.7 FPS
|
100.4 FPS
|
73.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 12.2 | 57.3 FPS
|
75.1 FPS
|
53.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 6.3 | 59.8 FPS
|
78.7 FPS
|
56.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 6.7 | 71.8 FPS
|
94.6 FPS
|
66.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 6.8 | 85.3 FPS
|
111.6 FPS
|
79.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 6 | 107.7 FPS
|
140.9 FPS
|
100.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 8.7 | 114.4 FPS
|
149.7 FPS
|
106.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 5.5 | 45 FPS
|
57.6 FPS
|
41.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 6 | 54.7 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
52.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 6 | 66.7 FPS
|
89 FPS
|
65.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 6.1 | 81.4 FPS
|
105.9 FPS
|
76.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 6.6 | 91.3 FPS
|
119.7 FPS
|
88.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 6.6 | 106.3 FPS
|
138.4 FPS
|
100.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 7.5 | 106.4 FPS
|
141.2 FPS
|
106.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 12.3 | 122.1 FPS
|
158.8 FPS
|
115.2 FPS
|
Intel Vs AMD: Which CPU is Best?
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Impact of RAM Size and Speed on Gaming Benchmarks
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Who Is Lilith and What Terrifies Us About This Diablo Demon?
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Why You Should Always Buy a Mid-to-High-Range Gaming PC?
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Should you buy a Pre-Built PC or a Custom PC?
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
How to use CPUAgent To Find The Right CPU
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
RTX 3070 with 10600k vs 3700x Bottleneck Comparison
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
10600K vs 3600X: Battle of the mid-range CPUs
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
10700K vs 3700X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
10900K vs 3900X: Specs, 80+ Game Benchmarks, Bottleneck, and Streaming Analysis
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
2500K vs 3570K vs 4670K vs 6600K vs 7600K vs 8600K vs 9600K vs 10600K: Should you consider upgrading?
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.