| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | enthusiast | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | AM4 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | No | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 1 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2020 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price | 499 USD | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Cores | 12 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Threads | 24 Threads | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Core Frequency | 3.8 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4.7 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.8 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 105 W | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 7 nm | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 128 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price-Value Score | 72.2 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 73 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 61 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 91 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 16.9 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 8.5 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 4.2 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 55/100 | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
Explore the Ryzen 9 3900XT! This Desktop processor is a highlight in AMD's enthusiast range. Introduced in 2020, it has 12 cores and 24 threads. It operates at a base frequency of 3.8GHz, can hit up to 4.7GHz, and has a power consumption of 105W, ready to upgrade your gaming setup. The Ryzen 9 3900XT is designed on the Matisse Refresh 7nm architecture and is a part of the respected Ryzen 9 series.
And guess what? The Ryzen 9 3900XT is the ultimate successor to AMD's previous-gen gaming champion, the Ryzen 7 2700X. The Ryzen 7 2700X was based on the legendary Zen+ and 12nm process, and it made its grand entrance into the gaming scene back in 2018. But now, it's time for the Ryzen 9 3900XT to take the throne and conquer the gaming world!
This CPU packs 12 cores and 24 threads, the first time this many come in a mainstream package! Plus, it costs about the same as the Core i9-9900K, which only has 8 cores and 16 threads. Talk about a total noob!
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is another epic drop from Team AMD, cranking things up in the neverending AMD vs Intel CPU war. But hey, core count ain't everything, especially for playing the hottest PC games. Single-core performance gotta be on point too.
Can the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT finally dethrone the king of mainstream CPUs, the Core i9-9900K? It's a maybe. The Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't quite reach the same single-core performance as its rival, but more games are starting to use all those threads, so who cares!
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is out for $499, which is a total steal! It goes toe-to-toe with the $530 Core i9-9900K but with four extra cores. The boost clock isn't as high, and the box might not be as fancy, but content creators, listen up! This is a beast of a CPU without that server price tag.
The AMD Ryzen 9 3rd Generation boasts the Zen 2 architecture, which brings 7nm processors to the mainstream for the first time. But there's more to this story than just a smaller size. Get ready for some serious performance upgrades!
Forget about low single-core performance being a weakness for AMD! With the 4.7GHz turbo boost and some sweet IPC improvements, the Ryzen 9 3900XT is finally competitive on the single-core front. Time to fry some noobs!
So, the switch to 7nm silicon is pretty epic! This lets AMD cram a ton more cache into the CPU. We're talking a combined L2 and L3 cache of 12 x 512 kB and 64. Since the cores are on separate chiplets, they were able to fit way more in – a whopping 12 x 512 kB and 64! This means much faster performance, especially when you're chasing those sweet high FPS in 1080p games. You'll especially notice the difference in classics like Counter Strike: Global Offensive. Git gud noobs!
No surprise here, a beastly 12-core, 24-thread CPU with a 4.7GHz boost clock absolutely shreds. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is the undisputed king of consumer CPUs (until you jump into the HEDT market, that is) – at least until you upgrade to the Ryzen 9 3950X. Get ready to dominate the competition!
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is an absolute monster, just like its 12 cores, 24 threads, and hefty price tag suggest. This is the top dog of mainstream processors, the king you've been waiting for. Games, video editing, 3D work – the Ryzen 9 3900XT handles it all with ease. Bow down to the king!
Heads up though, there are still a few tasks where the Core i9-9900K might perform a bit better. Think super old, single-threaded games like World of Warcraft. But even that gap is closing in fast. catching up!
The past few years, AMD has been clawing its way to the top of the desktop CPU game, and with the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, they've finally reached the peak. Move over Intel, there's a new sheriff in town!
AMD just unleashed its Zen 2 architecture, raising the stakes in the high-stakes battle for desktop PC dominance against Intel. This new lineup of chips pushes core counts and raw power to crazy high levels, threatening Intel's reign for the first time in a decade. Buckle up, it's about to get intense!
The Ryzen 9 3900XT sits just below the mighty Ryzen 9 3950X with its fancy 7nm compute die and beefy 16 cores and 32 threads. While the Ryzen 9 3950X might seem like the obvious winner, AMD has done some magic to keep the Ryzen 9 3900XT's single compute die design efficient. Plus, the higher TDP allows for more aggressive boost clocks. This means the Ryzen 9 3900XT could actually compete with the Ryzen 9 3950X in some games – who knew?
Alright, listen up. When it comes to pure gaming performance, Intel still holds the crown. If squeezing out every last frame per second is your top priority, then a Intel CPU might be the better choice. But here's the thing: that advantage shrinks at higher resolutions or if you pair the CPU with a less powerful graphics card. mattersToo
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, like all the other CPUs in AMD's Matisse Refresh family, is built on a tiny 7nm manufacturing process – the smallest you can find right now. This means it uses less power and runs much faster than previous CPUs.
Shrinking down to a 7nm process gives the Ryzen 9 3900XT a whopping 15% boost in IPC (instructions per clock). Basically, compared to a similar CPU from the last generation (Ryzen 9 2 Gen) clocked at the same speed, you'll get 15% better performance. It might not be a huge difference in everyday tasks, but it's still something.
The high number of threads (over 7!) in the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT makes it a monster for tasks that use all the cores at once (multi-threaded workloads), especially for the price. If you edit a lot of videos or work with giant spreadsheets, the Ryzen 9 3900XT will give you a noticeable performance boost.
Heads up! If you already have a Ryzen 7 2700X, this new generation doesn't offer a huge jump in performance. You might be better off waiting a year to upgrade or spending more on a higher-end CPU.
For gamers, both the Core i9-9900K and Ryzen 9 3900XT are great choices. They're neck and neck, with a slight edge to the Intel CPU if you don't overclock it. The Ryzen 9 3900XT's base performance can be achieved with cheaper RAM (around $90), whereas the Core i9-9900K needs faster RAM ($110-$120) to hit the frame rates we showed. The price difference is small though, and with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 graphics card, your GPU will bottleneck your performance anyway. BottleneckAtPlay
Today's review is on the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT, a 12-core desktop processor launched in Jul 2020. AMD sells the Ryzen 9 3900XT without integrated graphics, making it perfect for systems with a dedicated graphics card. It costs $499 and is a great option for those who already have a GPU.
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is a decent performing chip for $499. The main competitor at this price point is the Core i9-9900K, a 8-core unlocked processor with integrated graphics, which costs $530.
With Ryzen 9, AMD brings new innovation with its new architecture and a 7nm manufacturing process. Similar to Ryzen 9, Ryzen 9 is built for the AM4 platform with support for all the latest features like DDR4 RAM, super-fast NVMe SSDs, and Thunderbolt 3 ports.
Can you game on AMD's Ryzen 9 CPU? Absolutely! We got a solid 91% score in our gaming benchmarks.
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is a great choice for both gaming and content creation, thanks to its high performance (1.321%) and at least 12 threads. Live streaming, eSports, and uploading gameplay videos are becoming increasingly popular, and this CPU can handle it all.
The Ryzen 9 3900XT boosts up to the advertised 4.7 GHz, and with AMD's software you can push one core even higher to 4.7+0.1 GHz. But don't expect much beyond that without a serious cooler upgrade and manual voltage tweaks.
Building on the success of mainstream Ryzen 9 CPUs, AMD is now attacking the enthusiast market with the Ryzen 9 3900XT processors, available since Jul 2020.
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is priced at $499, which is a great deal compared to the almost $530 Intel Core i9-9900K. With 12 cores, the Ryzen 9 3900XT will outperform Intel's 8 core CPU in tasks that use multiple cores. While you don't get integrated graphics like Intel, most enthusiast gamers building a cheap PC won't need it anyway.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3 | 133.6 FPS
|
110.5 FPS
|
68.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 4.5 | 245.1 FPS
|
202.8 FPS
|
122.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2 | 132.6 FPS
|
109.8 FPS
|
67.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 3.3 | 269.8 FPS
|
223.2 FPS
|
134.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 3.4 | 296.8 FPS
|
245.4 FPS
|
148.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 8.3 | 241.1 FPS
|
203 FPS
|
134.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 1.7 | 115.6 FPS
|
95.8 FPS
|
61.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.3 | 132.7 FPS
|
111 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 2.7 | 148.2 FPS
|
123.3 FPS
|
79.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 2.8 | 215.5 FPS
|
177 FPS
|
116 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 2.9 | 273.8 FPS
|
230.5 FPS
|
152.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 4.2 | 284.9 FPS
|
239.9 FPS
|
159.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 2.6 | 306.8 FPS
|
258.5 FPS
|
171.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 4.9 | 328.8 FPS
|
277 FPS
|
183.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.3 | 28.1 FPS
|
20.4 FPS
|
12.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 7.6 | 36.9 FPS
|
29.7 FPS
|
17.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 6.5 | 38.1 FPS
|
30.4 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 15.3 | 97.7 FPS
|
77.6 FPS
|
50.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6 | 25 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
11.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 15.3 | 65.5 FPS
|
51.4 FPS
|
33.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 5.3 | 28.3 FPS
|
21.1 FPS
|
13.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.3 | 37.9 FPS
|
30.1 FPS
|
17.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 5.4 | 42.5 FPS
|
33.8 FPS
|
21.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 5.7 | 57.3 FPS
|
45.9 FPS
|
26.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 7 | 61.4 FPS
|
50.2 FPS
|
31.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 8.6 | 63.8 FPS
|
52.4 FPS
|
32.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 8.7 | 74.2 FPS
|
62.2 FPS
|
39.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 9.6 | 67.5 FPS
|
55.6 FPS
|
34.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 5.5 | 28.8 FPS
|
22.5 FPS
|
14.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 5.5 | 36.5 FPS
|
28.9 FPS
|
17.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 5.5 | 59.4 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
29.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 7.8 | 70.1 FPS
|
55.5 FPS
|
34.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 7.9 | 81.7 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
40.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 10.6 | 93.9 FPS
|
74.7 FPS
|
45.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 5.4 | 25.9 FPS
|
20.3 FPS
|
12.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 3.5 | 50.5 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
24.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 6.9 | 57.7 FPS
|
46.8 FPS
|
29.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.4 | 91.3 FPS
|
74.5 FPS
|
45.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.1 | 97.4 FPS
|
79.7 FPS
|
48.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4 | 19.6 FPS
|
15.4 FPS
|
8.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 22.6 | 132.8 FPS
|
111.4 FPS
|
71.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 10 | 120.3 FPS
|
99.1 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 3.9 | 20.5 FPS
|
16.2 FPS
|
9.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 2.8 | 70.4 FPS
|
55 FPS
|
32.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 2.7 | 63.1 FPS
|
49.4 FPS
|
29.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 3.4 | 29.4 FPS
|
23 FPS
|
13.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 2.8 | 101.3 FPS
|
82.1 FPS
|
50.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3 | 56.6 FPS
|
45.2 FPS
|
27.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 3.2 | 107.4 FPS
|
87.8 FPS
|
53.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.4 | 117.2 FPS
|
95.8 FPS
|
58.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 3.3 | 68.6 FPS
|
53.6 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 3.6 | 77.4 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
36.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 5.3 | 31.8 FPS
|
25.1 FPS
|
15.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 4.5 | 37.3 FPS
|
29.8 FPS
|
18.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4 | 63.6 FPS
|
50.1 FPS
|
30.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 2.8 | 60.4 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
29.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 4.5 | 88.9 FPS
|
71 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 4.2 | 96.6 FPS
|
77.8 FPS
|
47.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.8 | 104.2 FPS
|
84 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 6.2 | 122.7 FPS
|
102.7 FPS
|
64.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 2.8 | 54.1 FPS
|
43.2 FPS
|
26.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.3 | 71 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
34.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 2.7 | 81.5 FPS
|
65.7 FPS
|
40.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 2.6 | 86.6 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
42.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3 | 91.9 FPS
|
74 FPS
|
45.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 3.4 | 103 FPS
|
79.3 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 3.7 | 109.4 FPS
|
86.2 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.3 | 115.6 FPS
|
92.6 FPS
|
58.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.1 | 122 FPS
|
99.1 FPS
|
61.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.3 | 130.9 FPS
|
107.7 FPS
|
66.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5 | 138.5 FPS
|
115.1 FPS
|
72 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 8.5 | 152.6 FPS
|
128.1 FPS
|
80.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 15.9 | 156.8 FPS
|
131.6 FPS
|
82.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 5.8 | 120.3 FPS
|
98.4 FPS
|
60.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3 | 125.4 FPS
|
103.2 FPS
|
63.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.2 | 150.7 FPS
|
124 FPS
|
75.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.2 | 179 FPS
|
146.3 FPS
|
89.8 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 2.9 | 226 FPS
|
184.7 FPS
|
113.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 4.2 | 240.1 FPS
|
196.2 FPS
|
120.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 2.6 | 94.5 FPS
|
75.5 FPS
|
47.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 2.9 | 114.8 FPS
|
93.5 FPS
|
59 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 2.9 | 139.9 FPS
|
116.7 FPS
|
74.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 2.9 | 170.7 FPS
|
138.8 FPS
|
86.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.1 | 191.5 FPS
|
156.9 FPS
|
99.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.1 | 223.2 FPS
|
181.4 FPS
|
113.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3.6 | 223.3 FPS
|
185 FPS
|
119.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 5.9 | 256.1 FPS
|
208.1 FPS
|
130 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.