| Category | Desktop | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
|---|---|---|
| Target | mid-range | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Socket Compatibility | LGA1151 | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Integrated Graphics | None | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Cooler Included | Yes | ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Overclock Potential | 0 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Year | 2019 Model | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price | 169 USD | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Number of Cores | 6 Cores | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Number of Threads | 6 Threads | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Core Frequency | 2.9 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Boost Frequency | 4.1 GHz | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Max Stable Overclock | 4.1 GHz | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Power Consumption | 65 W | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Manufacturing Process | 14 nm | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Maximum Supported Memory | 128 GB | ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ |
| Price-Value Score | 87.5 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Speed Score | 62 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Productivity Score | 42 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Gaming Score | 87 % | ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |
| Max 1080p Bottleneck | 28.2 % | ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 1440p Bottleneck | 14.1 % | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
| Max 4K Bottleneck | 7.1 % | ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |
| Overall Score | 43/100 | ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Introducing the Core i5-9400F! This Desktop processor is a marvel in Intel's mid-range range. Debuted in 2019, it's packed with 6 cores and 6 threads. It operates at a base clock speed of 2.9GHz, can ramp up to 4.1GHz, and has a power consumption of 65W, ready to supercharge your gaming system. The Core i5-9400F is built on the Coffee Lake Refresh 14nm platform and belongs to the esteemed Core i5 series.
And guess what? The Core i5-9400F is the ultimate successor to Intel's previous-gen gaming champion, the Core i5-8400. The Core i5-8400 was based on the legendary Coffee Lake and 14nm process, and it made its grand entrance into the gaming scene back in 2017. But now, it's time for the Core i5-9400F to take the throne and conquer the gaming world!
The best CPUs are the ones that slay frames at a price that won't make you ragequit. The Core i5-9400F totally wins this game.
The Intel Core i5-9400F launched on Feb 2019 for $169, which is pretty much the same price as the last-generation Core i5-8400. At least there's no crazy price hike this generation!
Intel has been struggling lately to keep up with the new Ryzen 5 processors. This has forced them to get creative with their existing lineup. The Intel Core i5-9400F isn't exactly new - it's basically a Core i5-8400 with a higher clock speed. But there's one more twist...
The Intel has disabled the graphics on the Core i5-9400F, so it doesn't have any integrated graphics - just like the Ryzen 5 3500. This makes the Core i5-9400F cheaper than the Core i5-8400, even though the price difference might not be obvious at first glance. You can find the Core i5-9400F for $169 while the Core i5-8400 is still $182. That's a whopping 8% discount for the newer CPU! It's also cheaper than the Ryzen 5 3500 which costs $240.76.
For gamers, both the Ryzen 5 3500 and Core i5-9400F are great choices. They're neck and neck, with a slight edge to the AMD CPU if you don't overclock it. The Core i5-9400F's base performance can be achieved with cheaper RAM (around $90), whereas the Ryzen 5 3500 needs faster RAM ($110-$120) to hit the frame rates we showed. The price difference is small though, and with anything less than an RTX 2070 or Vega 64 graphics card, your GPU will bottleneck your performance anyway. BottleneckAtPlay
Today's review is on the Intel Core i5-9400F, a 6-core desktop processor launched in Feb 2019. Intel sells the Core i5-9400F without integrated graphics, making it perfect for systems with a dedicated graphics card. It costs $169 and is a great option for those who already have a GPU.
One of the best things about the Intel Core i5-9400F is that it comes with a free CPU cooler! You can grab the Core i5-9400F for $169 without having to spend extra on cooling.
The Intel Core i5-9400F comes with a basic heatsink cooler, nothing fancy. But it gets the job done for this low-power CPU (TDP of 65W). You won't need a fancy aftermarket cooler unless you want to overclock it.
For a 6-core CPU, the Intel Core i5-9400F is a steal at $169! It seems crazy cheap compared to its main competitor, the 6-core AMD Ryzen 5 3500 which costs $240.76. Basically, you get extra cores for almost nothing.
However, the Intel Core i5-9400F falls a bit behind in clock speeds. The Ryzen 5 3600 can reach 3.6GHz base clock and boost up to 4.2GHz.
With Core i5, Intel brings new innovation with its new architecture and a 14nm manufacturing process. Similar to Core i5, Core i5 is built for the LGA1151 platform with support for all the latest features like DDR4 RAM, super-fast NVMe SSDs, and Thunderbolt 3 ports.
Can you game on Intel's Core i5 CPU? Absolutely! We got a solid 87% score in our gaming benchmarks.
Looking for an affordable powerhouse CPU for work and play? Look no further than the Core i5-9400F!
Building on the success of mainstream Core i5 CPUs, Intel is now attacking the mid-range market with the Core i5-9400F processors, available since Feb 2019.
Below is a comparison of all graphics cards average FPS performance (using an average of 80+ games at ultra quality settings), combined with the Intel Core i5-9400F.
| Graphics Card | Price | Cost Per Frame | Avg 1080p | Avg 1440p | Avg 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.5 | 115.4 FPS
|
103.7 FPS
|
66.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 16GB | $ 1,099 | $ 5.2 | 211.8 FPS
|
190.4 FPS
|
118.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7600 8GB | $ 269 | $ 2.3 | 114.6 FPS
|
103.1 FPS
|
65.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT 20GB | $ 899 | $ 3.9 | 233.1 FPS
|
209.5 FPS
|
130.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB | $ 999 | $ 3.9 | 256.4 FPS
|
230.4 FPS
|
143.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24GB | $ 1,999 | $ 9.6 | 208.3 FPS
|
190.6 FPS
|
130.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 8GB | $ 200 | $ 2 | 99.9 FPS
|
89.9 FPS
|
59.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | $ 299 | $ 2.6 | 114.6 FPS
|
104.2 FPS
|
69.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.1 | 128 FPS
|
115.8 FPS
|
77 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 12GB | $ 599 | $ 3.2 | 186.2 FPS
|
166.2 FPS
|
112.5 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 12GB | $ 799 | $ 3.4 | 236.5 FPS
|
216.4 FPS
|
148.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16GB | $ 1,199 | $ 4.9 | 246.2 FPS
|
225.2 FPS
|
154.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 3 | 265.1 FPS
|
242.7 FPS
|
166.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | $ 1,599 | $ 5.6 | 284.1 FPS
|
260.1 FPS
|
178.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.1 | 24.3 FPS
|
19.2 FPS
|
12.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 280 3GB | $ 279 | $ 8.7 | 31.9 FPS
|
27.9 FPS
|
16.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 285 2GB | $ 249 | $ 7.6 | 32.9 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 4GB | $ 1,499 | $ 17.8 | 84.4 FPS
|
72.8 FPS
|
49.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.9 | 21.6 FPS
|
16.4 FPS
|
10.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 6GB | $ 999 | $ 17.7 | 56.6 FPS
|
48.3 FPS
|
32.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R7 370 2GB | $ 149 | $ 6.1 | 24.4 FPS
|
19.9 FPS
|
12.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.1 | 32.7 FPS
|
28.3 FPS
|
17.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 380X 4GB | $ 229 | $ 6.2 | 36.7 FPS
|
31.7 FPS
|
20.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390 8GB | $ 329 | $ 6.6 | 49.5 FPS
|
43 FPS
|
26 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 390X 8GB | $ 429 | $ 8.1 | 53.1 FPS
|
47.1 FPS
|
30.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY 4GB | $ 549 | $ 10 | 55.1 FPS
|
49.2 FPS
|
31.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 4GB | $ 649 | $ 10.1 | 64.1 FPS
|
58.4 FPS
|
38 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB | $ 649 | $ 11.1 | 58.3 FPS
|
52.2 FPS
|
33.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2GB | $ 159 | $ 6.4 | 24.9 FPS
|
21.1 FPS
|
13.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2GB | $ 199 | $ 6.3 | 31.5 FPS
|
27.1 FPS
|
16.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB | $ 329 | $ 6.4 | 51.3 FPS
|
43.5 FPS
|
28.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB | $ 549 | $ 9.1 | 60.6 FPS
|
52.1 FPS
|
33.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB | $ 649 | $ 9.2 | 70.6 FPS
|
61.5 FPS
|
38.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB | $ 999 | $ 12.3 | 81.1 FPS
|
70.2 FPS
|
44.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 460 4GB | $ 140 | $ 6.3 | 22.4 FPS
|
19.1 FPS
|
12 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 470 4GB | $ 179 | $ 4.1 | 43.6 FPS
|
38.1 FPS
|
24.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB | $ 400 | $ 8 | 49.9 FPS
|
43.9 FPS
|
28.5 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.1 | 78.9 FPS
|
70 FPS
|
44.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.9 | 84.2 FPS
|
74.8 FPS
|
47.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.7 | 16.9 FPS
|
14.4 FPS
|
8.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN V 12GB | $ 2,999 | $ 26.1 | 114.7 FPS
|
104.6 FPS
|
69.3 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp 12GB | $ 1,199 | $ 11.5 | 104 FPS
|
93.1 FPS
|
61.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB | $ 79 | $ 4.5 | 17.7 FPS
|
15.2 FPS
|
9.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB 8GB | $ 199 | $ 3.3 | 60.8 FPS
|
51.6 FPS
|
31.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.1 | 54.5 FPS
|
46.4 FPS
|
28.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 560 4GB | $ 99 | $ 3.9 | 25.4 FPS
|
21.6 FPS
|
13.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.2 | 87.5 FPS
|
77.1 FPS
|
48.7 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 570 4GB | $ 169 | $ 3.5 | 48.9 FPS
|
42.5 FPS
|
26.3 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 8GB | $ 349 | $ 3.8 | 92.8 FPS
|
82.5 FPS
|
52.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.9 | 101.2 FPS
|
89.9 FPS
|
57 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 580 8GB | $ 229 | $ 3.9 | 59.3 FPS
|
50.3 FPS
|
31 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 590 8GB | $ 279 | $ 4.2 | 66.9 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
35.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3GB | $ 169 | $ 6.2 | 27.4 FPS
|
23.6 FPS
|
14.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB | $ 169 | $ 5.2 | 32.2 FPS
|
28 FPS
|
17.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB 6GB | $ 254 | $ 4.6 | 55 FPS
|
47.1 FPS
|
29.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 3GB | $ 170 | $ 3.3 | 52.2 FPS
|
44.8 FPS
|
28.4 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | $ 399 | $ 5.2 | 76.8 FPS
|
66.6 FPS
|
41.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB | $ 409 | $ 4.9 | 83.4 FPS
|
73 FPS
|
46.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5.5 | 90.1 FPS
|
78.8 FPS
|
50.1 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB | $ 759 | $ 7.2 | 106 FPS
|
96.4 FPS
|
62.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB | $ 149 | $ 3.2 | 46.7 FPS
|
40.6 FPS
|
25.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 4GB | $ 160 | $ 2.6 | 61.3 FPS
|
53.5 FPS
|
33.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 6GB | $ 220 | $ 3.1 | 70.4 FPS
|
61.7 FPS
|
39 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB | $ 229 | $ 3.1 | 74.8 FPS
|
65.6 FPS
|
41.6 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB | $ 279 | $ 3.5 | 79.4 FPS
|
69.5 FPS
|
44 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 6GB | $ 350 | $ 3.9 | 89 FPS
|
74.4 FPS
|
46.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB | $ 400 | $ 4.2 | 94.5 FPS
|
80.9 FPS
|
51.9 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 5 | 99.9 FPS
|
86.9 FPS
|
56.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8GB | $ 499 | $ 4.7 | 105.4 FPS
|
93.1 FPS
|
60 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 8GB | $ 699 | $ 6.2 | 113.1 FPS
|
101.1 FPS
|
64.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB | $ 699 | $ 5.8 | 119.7 FPS
|
108 FPS
|
69.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB | $ 1,299 | $ 9.8 | 131.9 FPS
|
120.3 FPS
|
78 FPS
|
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX 24GB | $ 2,499 | $ 18.4 | 135.5 FPS
|
123.5 FPS
|
80.2 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon VII 16GB | $ 699 | $ 6.7 | 104 FPS
|
92.4 FPS
|
58.6 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT 8GB | $ 379 | $ 3.5 | 108.3 FPS
|
96.9 FPS
|
61.4 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB | $ 479 | $ 3.7 | 130.2 FPS
|
116.4 FPS
|
72.9 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 16GB | $ 579 | $ 3.7 | 154.7 FPS
|
137.3 FPS
|
87.1 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB | $ 649 | $ 3.3 | 195.3 FPS
|
173.4 FPS
|
110 FPS
|
| AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 16GB | $ 999 | $ 4.8 | 207.4 FPS
|
184.2 FPS
|
116.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 6GB | $ 249 | $ 3.1 | 81.6 FPS
|
70.9 FPS
|
45.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | $ 329 | $ 3.3 | 99.2 FPS
|
87.8 FPS
|
57.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB | $ 399 | $ 3.3 | 120.9 FPS
|
109.6 FPS
|
72 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB | $ 499 | $ 3.4 | 147.5 FPS
|
130.3 FPS
|
84 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 10GB | $ 599 | $ 3.6 | 165.5 FPS
|
147.3 FPS
|
96.7 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | $ 699 | $ 3.6 | 192.8 FPS
|
170.3 FPS
|
109.8 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20GB | $ 799 | $ 4.1 | 192.9 FPS
|
173.7 FPS
|
116.2 FPS
|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB | $ 1,499 | $ 6.8 | 221.3 FPS
|
195.4 FPS
|
126 FPS
|
Jul 12, 2020 - A rivalry for the ages, and a question often asked and wondered about. Whenever you want to build or upgrade your PC, you have to make a decision: Buy an Intel or AMD processor?
Jul 5, 2020 - Does RAM size and speed affect your gaming performance? should you invest in a high performance RAM kit? Find out here.
Jul 24, 2023 No evil entity is more scary than Lilith herself, shrouded in darkness.
Jun 23, 2020 - Mid- and high-range builds perform very well for their price, and are better than the entry-level in terms of power, longevity, and reliability, and they offer more bang for your buck especially when looking at their price-by-year advantage.
Jun 11, 2020 - Pre-built systems are an attractive option for those who are less concerned with the minute details of every component in their build. Building your own PC is the best solution for those who want full control over every aspect of their build. It provides the most thorough customization options, from the CPU to the fans and lighting.
Jun 2, 2020 - How to find the Right CPU? Whether you’re building or upgrading a PC, the processor matters a lot. CPUAgent is the right tool to help you find and choose the right CPU for your needs.
Sep 03, 2020 - Save your CPU money and invest it in a powerful GPU instead. So, which affordable yet powerfulrt CPU strikes the best performance-price balance with the NVIDIA RTX 3070?
May 23, 2020 - The best performance to price value mid-range cpus are here. Find out more in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i5-10600K vs Ryzen 5 3600X's capabilities.
May 22, 2020 - Which one is worth it, Core i7-10700K or Ryzen 7 3700X? Find out in this comprehensive review and summary of the Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 7 3700X's capabilities.
May 21, 2020 - 10 cores vs 12 cores. Top-of-the-line very high-end cpus duke it out.
May 21, 2020 - In this massive comparison across 8 generations of Intel Core i5 series CPUs, we explore the performance improvements by generation and whether it is reasonable or not to upgrade to Intel's latest.